CSLB Application Processing Procedures & Stats

CSLB Application Processing Procedures were discussed at a recent meeting.

Below is part of a powerpoint presentation given at the 10/21/13 Licensing Committee Meeting where they discuss their “new” cslb application processing procedures. It seems to me that the more they try to explain away their decision to profile certain applicants and trades, the more it seems like they are failing at covering their backsides.

There are now 8 classifications that they have determined to be “critical.” Thus, triggering their new application processing procedures. They are: A-Gen Eng, B-Gen Building, C-10 Electrical, C-16 Fire Protection, C-20 HVAC, C-36 Plumbing, C-38 Refrigeration, and C-57 Water Well Drilling.

cslb application processing procedures

I’m wondering why the C-39 Roofing classification isn’t on the list? They are now required to carry workers comp. Are any of the other trades listed required to carry workers comp? That answer would be… No. What about the C-2 Insulation classification. If not done properly, there could be mold issues. Doesn’t that affect consumer’s health and safety? And how many C-57 license applications do they receive a year? 5? All of this wreaks of arbitrary, back room decisions. How did they come up with this list? Put all the trades in a hat and do a random draw?

Slide #2:

Critical Classifications

– License Classifications Where Work Done is Directly Connected to Consumers’ Health & Safety

Slide #6

Applicant’s Experience

All Applications are Reviewed for Experience

• In Critical Classifications, CSLB Verifies All Questionable Experience

How does the CSLB determine what is “questionable” experience? If it’s in the proper format, lists all the key words they’re looking for, what makes it “questionable.” I haven’t found anything on the CSLB website that defines “questionable.” There are many in this industry who would appreciate a more detailed explanation as to how, or why, these application processing procedures were put in to place.

There are more slides that raise a red flag for me. I’ll highlight those in another post. 

Jan-Aug 2013 StatisticsAverage per Month Percentage
Applications Received2,059
Questionable Experience Applications Pulled for Review1969.5%
Out of Average of 196 Applications Pulled per Month:  
Experience Verified/Applications Posted2110.7%
Applications Voided/Withdrawn6734.2%
Applications Sent to Formal Enforcement Division Investigation7437.8%
Applications Waiting Additional Information3417.3%


 If you’d like to see the entire PP presentation contained in the CSLB meeting packet, click here. CommitteeMeetingPacket20131021

Speak Your Mind